Thursday, July 19, 2012

What's hidden behind the name "F.A.L.T.U"?

The name of the movie F.A.L.T.U stands for "Fakirchand and Lakirchand Trust University". It is also the name of the university created by the protagonists of the film. 






The followings are some interesting facts concerning on the name of this movie:

  • "Fakir" in Hindi means "poverty". This is why at [00:32:13] of the film, Naj disagreed with Puja to name their university with Fakirchand, claiming it sounds too poor
  • "Fakirchand" is a Hindi slang meaning "A born loser", "miser", or an "idiot"
  • The name "Fakirchand" is also in fact the name of the existing liberal arts college in Kolkatta, India. 
  • "Lakir" in Hindi means "line/border", and so Naj likes this name better because it makes "Lakirchand" sounds smart and good at mathematics
  • The term "FALTU" in Hindi actually means "worthless" 

Personal Reflection #5 (Rouyard A.)


I was quite excited to watch F.A.L.T.U. because I like Bollywood movie. But this one was a little different from the one that I know, I am used to the traditional Indian movie with the traditional dance. 

The first song at the beginning set the tone of the movie. It is a comedy. The movie try to be a comedy but at the same time with a serious meaning. Unfortunately  this attempt is not very successful. The little sounds they keep playing during the entire movie to create a funny mood do not help to take it seriously. The movie takes a long time to arrive at the point that they want to demonstrate: “Children are never useless.It's just that they are use less“. However The music and the songs are really good, I really appreciate them, especially the one during the contest. I think it is my favourite part of the movie.

The very good point about the movie is the way the Indian education system is see. They emphasize the contradiction and the absurdity of the system. Why they let student leave school with very low grade when they perfectly know that they won't be accepted. The movie also shows the anxiety of young Indians when they fail and also the pressure the society and their parents put on them. India is facing a real problem with the increasing number of suicide among students.  Maybe they must change the system, university should not be the only choice. All students are not meant for university. t learn what they really want to do. However India is not the only country facing this issue. All over the world countries should maybe reconsider their education system. 



                                                                                                                                       Rouyard A.

Comments from friends


I watched this movie with two of my friends and I decided to ask them what they have think about it. If both of them find it really difficult to take it seriously, both have also like the idea that 'Children are never useless. It's just that they are use less'. I should say that I have been surprised by their remaks. They went beyond the movie and their impression of the movie and directly talk more about the message of the movie. Below it is their comments. 


Lourdes : 2 out of 5

The music and the dance were good. But the way they make a school from nothing is really unrealistic. The story makes no sense at all. But I like the idea that student must not be rejected because of their grades. Why the system lets student be graduate with a low grade if there is no chance that they get in a university. I  agree with the concept that none is totally useless, because people may have talents that you can’t grade. If they make effort in what they like they could still enjoy life and be very useful for the society..

Kendra: 3 out of 5

It was a good show if you not think about the concept. But when you that to look at the logistics it is not possible or it’s hard to believe or follow the show. You can’t take it as a serious movie. The overall concept where everyone is unique and should have a place despite what the educational system considers what people should have or follow is a good believe to follow. There are things that you can’t graded on in school. Going to university I have learned that you should follow your passion because if you are not happy with what you are doing in school than how do you expect to be happy outside the school.
                                                                                                                                             

Rouyard A.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

F.A.L.T.U and its comparison with Accepted (2006)

FALTU is the Hindi version of American movie "Accepted" which released in 2006. Generally, both movies are handling the same subject of contemporary society issues concerning on education. While the two movies are about a group of friends who are all rejected from university and therefore come out with the idea of forming the university of their own, there are also some similarities and differences between the two films that are worth mentioning:


SIMILARITIES



1. Themes
Both movies are emphasizing on following one's dreams by criticizing on the educational system nowadays that works only for turning people into robots and get them into the labor market. Both movies are based on the same idea that children nowadays have become a victim of cruel education system, and so they have to study very hard even though they are still not sure about what they really wants in life. As the world has approached more on the liberal ways, freedom of choice has become more interesting. Therefore, these two films has worked as a loudspeaker speaking out contemporary global students' minds. 



DIFFERENCES


1. Cultural aspect shown in the films

F.A.L.T.U - In the scene where the main characters got flashback to their possible future if they were not going to college (00:29:05 to 00:29:30), Ritesh saw himself becoming a servant/cleaner; Puja saw herself got into an arranged marriage; and Nanj saw himself being spanked by his father.

Puja being terrified just by imagining herself being part of an arrange marriage



From this it is interesting because those visions are based on Indian culture and therefore we were not seeing these in an American version. Puja is a symbol of a contemporary Indian women who would rather go to college than getting married in such young age with a man whom she barely knows. This is the issue in which Indian society has been facing for centuries. Meanwhile, Nanj portrays Eastern culture where parents still punish their children with the old ways of spanking or physical harm, something that is rarely be seen anymore in the western world. In case of Ritesh, it signifies the caste system in Indian society where uneducated person will become as low as the cleaner. The same value cannot be portrayed in the western version due to the concept of equality among people and thus none of the occupations should be looked down on. 


2. Commercialization
Accepted - The film is more commercialized compare to F.A.L.T.U; to begin with, there is  a romantic relationship happens between main characters. While F.A.L.T.U are pursuing more on the friendship aspects among the 3 friends, Accepted has added romantic elements between Bartleby and Monica in order to get broader scope of audience.
While Puja in FALTU worrying about arrange marriage, Accepted is
romanticizing the atmosphere by pairing up Bartleby and Monica
Next is the addition of a villain or a "bad guy" to stir up the mood in the show. Abernathy has symbolized the children whi has turned themselves into the "system" or the flow of labor force. in other words, Abernathy is the symbol of "perfection", or the ideal student that will become an efficient personnel of the society in the future. This has contrasted to the main characters who symbolized "failure", "loser" or "unconventional". Nevertheless, the film has then showed that in the end everyone should has an option to do what s/he loves. In the world nowadays, creativity and motivation are important and therefore the film has reflected the needs of the society to understand more on the youth. 

confrontation between Bartleby and Abernathy 

3. Curriculum
F.A.L.T.U - the curriculum in this film is based majorly on vocational path such as barber, chef, fashion designer, and so on. The students here seemed to be still attached to the reality that although they can do what they want, they still need to be professional for a secure future. In the scene from 1:25:00 onward we can see all the students in the hall that separated into sections: tattoo art, cooking, hairdressing, fashion designing and so on. In this we can see that the curriculum does has its limit to not going outside the box as much as in Accepted.

Tattooing department

Cooking department with hairdressing department in the back

Accepted - the curriculum is more liberal and absurd. It is based entirely on the needs of the students who does not want to go to college but the value of the society forces them too. In here we will see many unconventional subjects such as Foreign Affairs: Hooking up overseas, doinf nothing 405, wingman-ing 101 and so on. The curriculum showing here is rather satirical to the current education system globally. The students in S.H.I.T look entirely gave up on education to pursue what they really wants. In this sense it seems that students here ahs been taught to understand the living philosophy rather than academic proficiency for the future.


The curriculum is freely based on student's need, but should this has limit?

To conclude this part, in both films show ideal universities in which students can learn what they really wants. However, I believe it is the culture that made the two films turning out different. While Accepted has showed the mock-up curriculum that satirically based on the normal curriculum in almost every universities, F.A.L.T.U has showed the curriculum that are partly similar to those in the normal universities, only that it based on students' preferences.


Personal Reflection #2 (Sartrapai S.)

I think this movie is good for passing time although I wouldn’t select it from the shelf if I have a choice. Comparing to Accepted (2006), this movie has more logic than its counter version. Also F.A.L.T.U has more elaborate detail than the American version. My favorite scenes so far are when Ritesh heard his father talking about useless good. I think this is a perfect metaphor for the theme. The second one is when his father accepted Ritesh choice. It is logical and touching.  However, I still prefer Accepted than this version. The movie has too many songs that I’d call it a musical. And I just feel that sometimes it is not necessary. It is distracting and annoying to some extent. I’d say the idea and logic are great, but production and the little details degrade them. 
       
 Sartrapai S.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Reviews from the Media

Despite our articles you still don't know if you want to watch this movie? Don't worry, these reviews are here to help you.
First here it is review from professionals.

Gaurav Malani in the Indian Economic and the Times of India
Rating : 2 stars 

Faltu starts as a fun-n-frivolous campus on the lines of Style but switches sensibilities to '3 idiots' somewhere in between with a moral message appended to its superficial story.
Remade from the Hollywood flick Accepted (2006), the story is about friends Ritesh (Jacky Bhagnani), Pooja (Pooja Gupta) and Nanj (Angad Bedi) who are turned don by every college, thanks to their below-average marks. With the help of friend Google chand (Arshad Warsi), they plan to pose a rundown property as their new college to appease their parents. Baaji Rao (Riteish Deshmukh) pretends to be the young principal of the Institute.


                                

Review By Business Star: 3 stars out of 5
What's good:   The dialogues; performances of the artistes; music.
What's bad: The screenplay could have done with more plausibility. The film reminds too much of '3 Idiots' but reaches nowhere near it.
Verdict: F.A.L.T.U is a youthful film which offers fair entertainment.
Loo break: A couple in the second half
Watch or not?: Definitely! Go and enjoy!!

Review by Ankur Pathak:
Rediff Rating: 3 stars out of 5

[...]  Most of F.A.L.T.U. is pleasing. Although the premise is unrealistic, to stretch the parameters that decide authenticity, the movie convinces you, and moreover, even in its fabricated fashion, it does succeed in confronting the flaws in our educational scenario.
[...] FALTU targets the challenging tour of transition from high school (junior college) to a well-recognised degree institute whereas the latter stressed on the pressure post entering.
Although FALTU's screenplay is openly lifted from 'Accepted', as the movie terminates it takes its own course resulting into an unexpectedly charming climax that metaphorically demonstrates the teething troubles of students stuck in a just passed to an average category.[...]
[...] An ambitious sophomore story of scholastically dim students coursing an almost impossible journey to prove their worth, enrolling for once in FALTU, might not be a faltu idea after all.


If  you want the complete reviews of Komal Nahtra or Ankur Pathak follow the link belows. Komal Nahtra makes a very fair review for the movie.

Link:



                                                                                                                                           By Astrid.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Personal Reflection #3 (Surathumrong S.)

I think this movie has reflected several points concerning on society and its perception on education. In many scenes show the reasons why higher education is needed and that everyone should go to the university. One of the examples is from (1:15:00) to (1:16:50) where the students were burning books, which made Google and Baaji Rao to be very frustrated about. 


the future is also gone when one choose to abandon knowledge and education

As he scolding the kids, he said that it were not books that actually burned but rather the kids' future. Google later mentioned that he too one abandoned education, and therefore he has to struggle all of his life. I think in this sense the books symbolized the higher education as a whole, and by going to university can grant one a lot of privilege and opportunity in the society. 

The other example is from 00:27:50 to 00:29:32 when the main characters got look down by Vishnu's father as they were unable to go to the university. Not only their parents were ashamed of them but also threatened them with a kind of future they didn't want. 

The parents are ashamed because their children cannot enter university
From this proves that by entering the university can take one to the higher status in the society (one will be accepted and looked upon by others), and those who cannot enter will  stay at the lower level forever, even though he becomes successful later on in the future. By this I believe university is one of the social values that play a greater role in assuring one's position within a society; it does not really matter if one is smart or the other, as long as he can enter into the university. I believe this trend has overlooked the matter of intelligence, and university is more like a token for one to get in order to get into the higher level of social statuses. 

The issues mentioned in this film are partly related to my personal experience; it reminded me the importance of education, and the planning for the future after graduation. Back to the time when I was freshly graduated from high school in 2008, entrance examination was the greatest concern of my life and I had put all of my willpower and effort into doing my best for the examination. By that time everyone surrounded me keep on encouraging me to study hard in order to get into the top universities with no other options.It is not only for the sake of my future, but also for the reputation of my parents, my relative, my school, my friends and my teacher as well. Those who failed the exam will have to live though another one year of studying hard and even greater pressure from the world surrounded them. The most important thing at that time is, in fact, just like in the film at 00:24:00 - to get into the university, not to get any degree. It was a hard time that I'm glad I was getting through safely. 

the most important thing is to be accepted, not the degree or anything

The film also makes me think of the necessities of school, knowledge, and educating institutions and whether we depend our lives on it too much. nevertheless, the film majorly relies on an idealistic idea of going to the university to study just about anything we want to learn, although in reality there are factors to be concerned such as future career path, wages, welfare and so on. I believe there should be more curriculum available for us students to choose, and just like in the film, we should be able to liberally choose to pursue on the educational path that we really want. 

In terms of overall impression, I will give this movie 3 out of 5. The film is overwhelmed with   typical Bollywoood style; there are a lot of dancing, singing, awkward lines and facial expressions, and also the irrationality of the film. However, I also sense that this film has been Americanized by Western ideas getting from the American version of this movie "Accepted" (2006). This is partly because the idea of this movie is based on liberalism, which has been fully portrayed in Accepted. But on the contrary, the idea of giving education based on one's preferences is still lacked in Asian countries due to culture and value. Moreover, I think this film is as if the director has put several music videos altogether; the camera has moved too often into almost every degrees possible; and the lighting and sound was still a little bit amateurish compare to other movies in the same genre. 

Surathumrong S.