Thursday, July 19, 2012

What's hidden behind the name "F.A.L.T.U"?

The name of the movie F.A.L.T.U stands for "Fakirchand and Lakirchand Trust University". It is also the name of the university created by the protagonists of the film. 






The followings are some interesting facts concerning on the name of this movie:

  • "Fakir" in Hindi means "poverty". This is why at [00:32:13] of the film, Naj disagreed with Puja to name their university with Fakirchand, claiming it sounds too poor
  • "Fakirchand" is a Hindi slang meaning "A born loser", "miser", or an "idiot"
  • The name "Fakirchand" is also in fact the name of the existing liberal arts college in Kolkatta, India. 
  • "Lakir" in Hindi means "line/border", and so Naj likes this name better because it makes "Lakirchand" sounds smart and good at mathematics
  • The term "FALTU" in Hindi actually means "worthless" 

Personal Reflection #5 (Rouyard A.)


I was quite excited to watch F.A.L.T.U. because I like Bollywood movie. But this one was a little different from the one that I know, I am used to the traditional Indian movie with the traditional dance. 

The first song at the beginning set the tone of the movie. It is a comedy. The movie try to be a comedy but at the same time with a serious meaning. Unfortunately  this attempt is not very successful. The little sounds they keep playing during the entire movie to create a funny mood do not help to take it seriously. The movie takes a long time to arrive at the point that they want to demonstrate: “Children are never useless.It's just that they are use less“. However The music and the songs are really good, I really appreciate them, especially the one during the contest. I think it is my favourite part of the movie.

The very good point about the movie is the way the Indian education system is see. They emphasize the contradiction and the absurdity of the system. Why they let student leave school with very low grade when they perfectly know that they won't be accepted. The movie also shows the anxiety of young Indians when they fail and also the pressure the society and their parents put on them. India is facing a real problem with the increasing number of suicide among students.  Maybe they must change the system, university should not be the only choice. All students are not meant for university. t learn what they really want to do. However India is not the only country facing this issue. All over the world countries should maybe reconsider their education system. 



                                                                                                                                       Rouyard A.

Comments from friends


I watched this movie with two of my friends and I decided to ask them what they have think about it. If both of them find it really difficult to take it seriously, both have also like the idea that 'Children are never useless. It's just that they are use less'. I should say that I have been surprised by their remaks. They went beyond the movie and their impression of the movie and directly talk more about the message of the movie. Below it is their comments. 


Lourdes : 2 out of 5

The music and the dance were good. But the way they make a school from nothing is really unrealistic. The story makes no sense at all. But I like the idea that student must not be rejected because of their grades. Why the system lets student be graduate with a low grade if there is no chance that they get in a university. I  agree with the concept that none is totally useless, because people may have talents that you can’t grade. If they make effort in what they like they could still enjoy life and be very useful for the society..

Kendra: 3 out of 5

It was a good show if you not think about the concept. But when you that to look at the logistics it is not possible or it’s hard to believe or follow the show. You can’t take it as a serious movie. The overall concept where everyone is unique and should have a place despite what the educational system considers what people should have or follow is a good believe to follow. There are things that you can’t graded on in school. Going to university I have learned that you should follow your passion because if you are not happy with what you are doing in school than how do you expect to be happy outside the school.
                                                                                                                                             

Rouyard A.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

F.A.L.T.U and its comparison with Accepted (2006)

FALTU is the Hindi version of American movie "Accepted" which released in 2006. Generally, both movies are handling the same subject of contemporary society issues concerning on education. While the two movies are about a group of friends who are all rejected from university and therefore come out with the idea of forming the university of their own, there are also some similarities and differences between the two films that are worth mentioning:


SIMILARITIES



1. Themes
Both movies are emphasizing on following one's dreams by criticizing on the educational system nowadays that works only for turning people into robots and get them into the labor market. Both movies are based on the same idea that children nowadays have become a victim of cruel education system, and so they have to study very hard even though they are still not sure about what they really wants in life. As the world has approached more on the liberal ways, freedom of choice has become more interesting. Therefore, these two films has worked as a loudspeaker speaking out contemporary global students' minds. 



DIFFERENCES


1. Cultural aspect shown in the films

F.A.L.T.U - In the scene where the main characters got flashback to their possible future if they were not going to college (00:29:05 to 00:29:30), Ritesh saw himself becoming a servant/cleaner; Puja saw herself got into an arranged marriage; and Nanj saw himself being spanked by his father.

Puja being terrified just by imagining herself being part of an arrange marriage



From this it is interesting because those visions are based on Indian culture and therefore we were not seeing these in an American version. Puja is a symbol of a contemporary Indian women who would rather go to college than getting married in such young age with a man whom she barely knows. This is the issue in which Indian society has been facing for centuries. Meanwhile, Nanj portrays Eastern culture where parents still punish their children with the old ways of spanking or physical harm, something that is rarely be seen anymore in the western world. In case of Ritesh, it signifies the caste system in Indian society where uneducated person will become as low as the cleaner. The same value cannot be portrayed in the western version due to the concept of equality among people and thus none of the occupations should be looked down on. 


2. Commercialization
Accepted - The film is more commercialized compare to F.A.L.T.U; to begin with, there is  a romantic relationship happens between main characters. While F.A.L.T.U are pursuing more on the friendship aspects among the 3 friends, Accepted has added romantic elements between Bartleby and Monica in order to get broader scope of audience.
While Puja in FALTU worrying about arrange marriage, Accepted is
romanticizing the atmosphere by pairing up Bartleby and Monica
Next is the addition of a villain or a "bad guy" to stir up the mood in the show. Abernathy has symbolized the children whi has turned themselves into the "system" or the flow of labor force. in other words, Abernathy is the symbol of "perfection", or the ideal student that will become an efficient personnel of the society in the future. This has contrasted to the main characters who symbolized "failure", "loser" or "unconventional". Nevertheless, the film has then showed that in the end everyone should has an option to do what s/he loves. In the world nowadays, creativity and motivation are important and therefore the film has reflected the needs of the society to understand more on the youth. 

confrontation between Bartleby and Abernathy 

3. Curriculum
F.A.L.T.U - the curriculum in this film is based majorly on vocational path such as barber, chef, fashion designer, and so on. The students here seemed to be still attached to the reality that although they can do what they want, they still need to be professional for a secure future. In the scene from 1:25:00 onward we can see all the students in the hall that separated into sections: tattoo art, cooking, hairdressing, fashion designing and so on. In this we can see that the curriculum does has its limit to not going outside the box as much as in Accepted.

Tattooing department

Cooking department with hairdressing department in the back

Accepted - the curriculum is more liberal and absurd. It is based entirely on the needs of the students who does not want to go to college but the value of the society forces them too. In here we will see many unconventional subjects such as Foreign Affairs: Hooking up overseas, doinf nothing 405, wingman-ing 101 and so on. The curriculum showing here is rather satirical to the current education system globally. The students in S.H.I.T look entirely gave up on education to pursue what they really wants. In this sense it seems that students here ahs been taught to understand the living philosophy rather than academic proficiency for the future.


The curriculum is freely based on student's need, but should this has limit?

To conclude this part, in both films show ideal universities in which students can learn what they really wants. However, I believe it is the culture that made the two films turning out different. While Accepted has showed the mock-up curriculum that satirically based on the normal curriculum in almost every universities, F.A.L.T.U has showed the curriculum that are partly similar to those in the normal universities, only that it based on students' preferences.


Personal Reflection #2 (Sartrapai S.)

I think this movie is good for passing time although I wouldn’t select it from the shelf if I have a choice. Comparing to Accepted (2006), this movie has more logic than its counter version. Also F.A.L.T.U has more elaborate detail than the American version. My favorite scenes so far are when Ritesh heard his father talking about useless good. I think this is a perfect metaphor for the theme. The second one is when his father accepted Ritesh choice. It is logical and touching.  However, I still prefer Accepted than this version. The movie has too many songs that I’d call it a musical. And I just feel that sometimes it is not necessary. It is distracting and annoying to some extent. I’d say the idea and logic are great, but production and the little details degrade them. 
       
 Sartrapai S.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Reviews from the Media

Despite our articles you still don't know if you want to watch this movie? Don't worry, these reviews are here to help you.
First here it is review from professionals.

Gaurav Malani in the Indian Economic and the Times of India
Rating : 2 stars 

Faltu starts as a fun-n-frivolous campus on the lines of Style but switches sensibilities to '3 idiots' somewhere in between with a moral message appended to its superficial story.
Remade from the Hollywood flick Accepted (2006), the story is about friends Ritesh (Jacky Bhagnani), Pooja (Pooja Gupta) and Nanj (Angad Bedi) who are turned don by every college, thanks to their below-average marks. With the help of friend Google chand (Arshad Warsi), they plan to pose a rundown property as their new college to appease their parents. Baaji Rao (Riteish Deshmukh) pretends to be the young principal of the Institute.


                                

Review By Business Star: 3 stars out of 5
What's good:   The dialogues; performances of the artistes; music.
What's bad: The screenplay could have done with more plausibility. The film reminds too much of '3 Idiots' but reaches nowhere near it.
Verdict: F.A.L.T.U is a youthful film which offers fair entertainment.
Loo break: A couple in the second half
Watch or not?: Definitely! Go and enjoy!!

Review by Ankur Pathak:
Rediff Rating: 3 stars out of 5

[...]  Most of F.A.L.T.U. is pleasing. Although the premise is unrealistic, to stretch the parameters that decide authenticity, the movie convinces you, and moreover, even in its fabricated fashion, it does succeed in confronting the flaws in our educational scenario.
[...] FALTU targets the challenging tour of transition from high school (junior college) to a well-recognised degree institute whereas the latter stressed on the pressure post entering.
Although FALTU's screenplay is openly lifted from 'Accepted', as the movie terminates it takes its own course resulting into an unexpectedly charming climax that metaphorically demonstrates the teething troubles of students stuck in a just passed to an average category.[...]
[...] An ambitious sophomore story of scholastically dim students coursing an almost impossible journey to prove their worth, enrolling for once in FALTU, might not be a faltu idea after all.


If  you want the complete reviews of Komal Nahtra or Ankur Pathak follow the link belows. Komal Nahtra makes a very fair review for the movie.

Link:



                                                                                                                                           By Astrid.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Personal Reflection #3 (Surathumrong S.)

I think this movie has reflected several points concerning on society and its perception on education. In many scenes show the reasons why higher education is needed and that everyone should go to the university. One of the examples is from (1:15:00) to (1:16:50) where the students were burning books, which made Google and Baaji Rao to be very frustrated about. 


the future is also gone when one choose to abandon knowledge and education

As he scolding the kids, he said that it were not books that actually burned but rather the kids' future. Google later mentioned that he too one abandoned education, and therefore he has to struggle all of his life. I think in this sense the books symbolized the higher education as a whole, and by going to university can grant one a lot of privilege and opportunity in the society. 

The other example is from 00:27:50 to 00:29:32 when the main characters got look down by Vishnu's father as they were unable to go to the university. Not only their parents were ashamed of them but also threatened them with a kind of future they didn't want. 

The parents are ashamed because their children cannot enter university
From this proves that by entering the university can take one to the higher status in the society (one will be accepted and looked upon by others), and those who cannot enter will  stay at the lower level forever, even though he becomes successful later on in the future. By this I believe university is one of the social values that play a greater role in assuring one's position within a society; it does not really matter if one is smart or the other, as long as he can enter into the university. I believe this trend has overlooked the matter of intelligence, and university is more like a token for one to get in order to get into the higher level of social statuses. 

The issues mentioned in this film are partly related to my personal experience; it reminded me the importance of education, and the planning for the future after graduation. Back to the time when I was freshly graduated from high school in 2008, entrance examination was the greatest concern of my life and I had put all of my willpower and effort into doing my best for the examination. By that time everyone surrounded me keep on encouraging me to study hard in order to get into the top universities with no other options.It is not only for the sake of my future, but also for the reputation of my parents, my relative, my school, my friends and my teacher as well. Those who failed the exam will have to live though another one year of studying hard and even greater pressure from the world surrounded them. The most important thing at that time is, in fact, just like in the film at 00:24:00 - to get into the university, not to get any degree. It was a hard time that I'm glad I was getting through safely. 

the most important thing is to be accepted, not the degree or anything

The film also makes me think of the necessities of school, knowledge, and educating institutions and whether we depend our lives on it too much. nevertheless, the film majorly relies on an idealistic idea of going to the university to study just about anything we want to learn, although in reality there are factors to be concerned such as future career path, wages, welfare and so on. I believe there should be more curriculum available for us students to choose, and just like in the film, we should be able to liberally choose to pursue on the educational path that we really want. 

In terms of overall impression, I will give this movie 3 out of 5. The film is overwhelmed with   typical Bollywoood style; there are a lot of dancing, singing, awkward lines and facial expressions, and also the irrationality of the film. However, I also sense that this film has been Americanized by Western ideas getting from the American version of this movie "Accepted" (2006). This is partly because the idea of this movie is based on liberalism, which has been fully portrayed in Accepted. But on the contrary, the idea of giving education based on one's preferences is still lacked in Asian countries due to culture and value. Moreover, I think this film is as if the director has put several music videos altogether; the camera has moved too often into almost every degrees possible; and the lighting and sound was still a little bit amateurish compare to other movies in the same genre. 

Surathumrong S.

Personal reflection #4 (Charoenrach S.)

I think the idea of students starting their own college is really interesting and cool sometimes at college I feel like a lot what I'm learning will be useless and kind of pointless but if I could decide what I want to learn and plan out my own classes like they did in the movie I might get a lot less random classes that I have to take. I also feel like the pressure to receive good grades and always be number 1 is too much on student not everybody can be number 1 and they're has to be a place for the middle people to be able to go. It was an interesting movie but I don't think i will work so well in real life.


CHAROENRACH. S

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Members' Personal Reflection #1 (Athiprayoon W.)

As for me, I personally like the whole idea behind the movie. What struck me most while watching are the quotes from two scenes.The first one from the principal saying that 'children is never useless, they are just used less.' and the second one is the conversation between the dad and his worker in the junk shop. Both seem to have the same core idea, Faltu means useless, but the children will never be used less if we know their worth and fix it or made it to be ready to use. Here is the point where I found what the father has said very inspiring. Besides, I absolutely support the idea of building the school for alternative education that encourage the students to pursue their dream and learn what they are interested in. Studying only for exam can be useless in the future if we don't even know what we really are capable of doing. As a result, our potential is also used less because of the different purpose of education---one for exam and one for life. 
It's Faltu (Useless)!
Yes! What's useless for others...I know the true worth of those things


But we made it fit to use.. 


Technically speaking, this is the first Bollywood movie I have ever watched. The movie is a enjoyable adaptation version of the Hollywood movies that is instructive in some degree with the representation of some the Indian sociocultural context in the scene of the students are being punished is where the subject of parents and gratitude are being brought up. This is the lesson that we can find only in Asian movie. Despite the fact that music is the significant characteristic of Bollywood movies, it doesn't mean that it have to turn all music scenes into music video by using too many camera movement. And that is the part where I don't like about the film. Moreover, the selection of the music in movie are also closely related to what the movie are trying to say. In other words, music is a tool for story-telling which can be observed in the following video.  





                          

My favorite scene is from the scene where FALTU students decided to go for the competition. At this scene, I found myself learning a lot from the 4 minutes show by FALTU. It shows the message about problems in education system such as focusing on grade rather than true potential of the child and the selective process of higher education based on percentage. All of which can  cause the high amount of pressure on children that can be harmful to their future. This scene has presented the the idea of education that FALTU seems to promote which is the opportunity to find yourself and to know your potential so a to break free from the system. Education system create a world apart which made the concept of no child left behind became just an ideal that far reach, because of the process of selection by score that legitimate the admission opportunity. At this point, opportunity is what is lack. Therefore, what we need now is power and support from communities and government to fulfill what is lack. 
Education is suppose to be for all---for all who willing to learn.

Athiprayoon W.


 Credits: - Photos from Movie F.A.L.T.U
               - Video from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLSMxghIPFs

Relation to Course Materials



The movie opens with the four friends are walking to the examination room. The moment Vishnu recites how the students who got more than 90% study until the door opens, is a symbolic scene of how much students must study in order to pass their examination. This is similar to Frieire’s concept of Banking system in which currently dominating in most educational system all over the world. Nanj then wishes that the door never opened for fear of failure. It is his (Nanj) worst fear that he would fail the test and then result in his parents’ disappointment. This emotional vulnerability, as Carnoy and IDAC, put it is similar to how Akutsu sensei in the Queen Classroom (2005) installed in her students mind. The only difference in this is, no one directly installed the fear into Nanj’s heart. This implication of failure into the hearts of students also caused the personal reflex of being useless. When the result is revealed and Vishnu has scored only 94% which is 1% less than what he desperately wishes to get, fear crept to his hear that he would not be qualified enough for St. Peter and for his father’s standard. This qualification method by ranking students from top to bottom encourages a hierarchy in society instead of lessen it as school should do by providing equality for everyone. Similarly to caste system, by posting score on the board as happened in the movie and Ritesh and Nanj have to bend down to find their name is a symbolism of this system. Instead of being able to stand up with their head held high, they need to bend down and be at the bottom of the board.
As the movie introduces Mr. Baaji Rao by the scene of him, disregarding the curriculum, taught his students by watching movie instead of following the conventional curriculum bringing himself to the principle’s attention. By choosing teachable moment, Mr. Baaji Rao is a teacher who is very rare in this society where teachers tend to follow order and do what they are told instead of really teach their students when the moment comes. In a sense, Mr. Baaji Rao is similar to Kanamori Sensei.
F.A.L.T.U is an institution that comes into being from the power of union by all of the students. This university, instead of teaching conventional curriculum, it teaches transferable skills that would help students to gain skill for their future. The university has no official teacher, only videos from expert in each profession. Therefore, the knowledge is not colonized and there is no social structure appears in the university. 


Sartrapai S.

References: 
Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as cultural imperialism. New York: David Mccoy Company, Inc.
Freire, P. (1995). Pedagory of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc.
Futoshi, O., & Naoyuki, N. (Directors). (2005). The Queen's Classrom [Motion Picture].
IDAC Team. (1970). Danger school! Geneva: Other India Press.
Kaetsu, N. (Director). (2003). Children full of life [Motion Picture].

Cinematography

Section 1: Movement 

In the making of one film, there are many types of camera movement that we can consider while watching these moving image. Since the word 'cinematography' ,according to Lacey(2009), means 'recording movement', this is one of the most important part in the making of each scene in cinema and television. 

     1.1) Crane shot 


High School Scene

FALTU College 

     The use of 'crane shot' is how the filmmaker shoots the scene by moving the camera above the air in order to create the sense of mobility in the scene and to give the audience the feeling of ubiquity. There are several use of crane shot and establishing shots in this movie to introduce the beginning of the new scene that are significant to the movie plot.This is how these two kinds of camera movement introduce the audience to the location where the main characters are present. For example, in the beginning of the movie, the use of these two shots guide us to the high school's classroom where the final examination has taken place. The second one is in the scene at the opening day of FALTU college where all the accepted students arrive.  
   
     
     1.2) Pan 

                            





This is the camera movement that produces a mobile framing by moving the camera horizontally with a speed. This technique has been used in many scenes especially when the characters start singing and dancing. The Pan will move quickly through 360 degrees of a circle and cause the blurring in the scene which can be called as a 'whip pan'.

Athiprayoon W.                                                                              

Section 2: Quality



Shallow focus


In FALTU, the Shallow focus is used in the video scene where people are mounting the support for  FALTU college during its critical  period of being claimed as a fake college. The use of shallow focus in this scene gives the viewers feeling of documentary video. The shot will keep the sharp focus on one particular object or element in a scene by using 'close-up' shot which provide much attention to an individual's actions or thoughts.   


Section 3: Digital Technique 

Split Scene 




We found many uses of 'split scene' technique in FALTU's music video scenes. This is a technique that has been popularize among film and video production to show many simultaneously actions on the same scene by allowing one or more actors to appear twice at the same time.  
                                                                                       
                                                                                        Surathumrong S.

Section 4: Lighting 

4.1) High Key lighting





The High-Key lighting produce a very bright images with very few shadow on the subject. The bright light technique is popular among musical or comedy movies so as to give the entertaining atmosphere to the scene.    

4.2) Low Key lighting




The Low-Key lighting is often use a strong shadow to obscure some part of the figure in order to create a suspicious look to the scene or the character. For example, this scene, the use of Low key lighting has given the image of the primary school principal as an intimidating figure



Sartrapai S.




Reference: Lacey,N.(2009). Image and representation key concepts in media studies. China:Palgrave macmillan. 

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Casts and Charaters

Characters in F.A.L.T.U movie



1. Arshad Warsi: Here comes the guy with FROG eyes. Arshad Warsi is acting as Mr. Google Chand aka Mr. Fix IT who is having solution for all individuals as well as for group.





2. Chandan Roy Sanyal: A dweeb to the nub. Chandan Roya Sanyal aka Vishnu’s life rotate his bunch of friends even if they are totally opposite to him in terms of thinking and lifestyle. 


3. Jackky Bhagnani: This character is the most funniest in FALTU movie. Jackky Bhagnani (Ritesh) is very straight forward guy who lives for today and not for tomorrow. Ritesh motto is to enjoy and laugh at others foolish activities.


4. Riteish Deshmukh: Riteish Deshmukh is acting as a “Baaji Rao” who always look for good friend circle who accepts, applaud and appreciate him. Baaji Rao is having too much creativity which is misunderstood by his friends but thats a sad part.

5. Pooja GuptaPooja Gupta (pooja) is a hoyden who lives with her three male buddies and love to listen music 24/7. Pooja’s father want her to get married as soon as possible but she doesn’t want to spoil her life as she is not a marriage material woman.



6. Angad Bedi: Nanj (Angad Bedi), he is a big dumbo guy but sweet and soft from heart who doesn’t like to keep any bitter feelings for anybody even if the person is bad.  




Producer: Vashu Bhagnani.




Casting: Jackky Bhagnani – Ritesh,

 Pooja Gupta – Pooja

 Akshay Kumar – Cameo, 

Riteish Deshmukh – Baaji Rao, 

R Madhavan – Cameo, 

Angad Bedi – Nanj, 

Chandan Roy Sanyal – Vishnu, 

Amitabh Bachchan – Cameo,

 Abhishek Bachchan – Cameo, 

Kareena Kapoor – Cameo, Salman Khan – Cameo, 

Sushmita Sen – Cameo, 

Mallika Sherawat – Cameo, 

Akbar Khan – Cameo,

 Arshad Warsi – Google Chand 

 Saahil Khan.



Retrieved from: 
1.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1667076/
2.http://popcorn.oneindia.in/movie-cast/8975/faltu.html